We continue our discussion of Michael Behe’s latest case for intelligent design. Not only does his “First Rule of Adaptive Evolution” betray his lack of understanding of natural selection, it also conflicts with empirical data. In his attempt to respond to these empirical difficulties, he creates even more problems for himself. We also discuss the creationist fixation on “randomness” in evolution and a naturalistic universe.
Contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org or on Facebook
Support on Patreon or give a one-time donation through Venmo @emersongreenpodcast
. . .
Michael Behe – Darwin Devolves Summary [YouTube]
All of Behe’s Responses to Criticism [DarwinDevolves]
Richard Lenski – On Damaged Genes and Polar Bears [TelliamedRevisited]
Nathan Lents – Behe’s Last Stand [Skeptic]
Nathan Lents et al. Criticize Darwin Devolves [ScienceMag]
Behe Summarizes “Central argument of the book” [EvolutionNews]
Jerry Coyne Responds to Behe’s EN Post [Whyevolutionistrue]
Behe’s Colleagues Criticize Darwin Devolves – Gregory Lang, Amber Rice [Wiley Online Library]
Behe’s 2010 Paper [Quarterly Review of Biology]
Jerry Coyne’s Response to Behe’s 2010 Paper [Whyevolutionistrue]
Darwin Devolves – Michael Behe [Amazon]