Stephen Law’s Evil God presents a challenge to theists: Explain why the hypothesis that there exists an omnipotent, omniscient, and omni-benevolent god should be considered significantly more reasonable than an omnipotent, omniscient, and omni-malevolent god. Many of the most popular arguments for god’s existence (first cause, intelligent design, fine-tuning) don’t give us any indication of god’s moral orientation. So is there any way to render Good God significantly more reasonable to believe in than Evil God?
Sorry again about the cold if it hurt the quality.
Contact me at firstname.lastname@example.org or on Facebook
Support on Patreon
Read transcripts of the podcast and discuss other issues at the Counter Apologetics Blog
Listen to Magic Tricks by Whalers
The Evil God Challenge — Stephen Law [Cambridge University Press]
Stephen Law — Evil God Challenge [The Panpsycast]
Evil God Challenge — CFI UK [YouTube]
Podcast: Play in new window | Download